Assignments essay Essay Example for Free

Assignments exposition Essay |Assessors remarks | |Qualification |QCF Level 7 : Extended Diploma in Strategic |Assessor name |Atif Kauser | |Management Leadership | |Unit number and title |4-Developing corporate culture |Learner name | |Assignment title |Culture, Objectives and improving corporate atmosphere | |Assessment Criteria |Achieved? | |AC 1.1: clarify how models of association culture can be utilized to accomplish hierarchical targets | |AC 1.2: clarify the distinction among authoritative and national culture | |AC 1.3: examine the corporate social profile in an association | |AC 1.4: talk about the effect of an organisation’s corporate culture in accomplishing its goals | |AC 2. 1: assess the current atmosphere of an association | |AC 2.2: prescribe approaches to improve corporate atmosphere in an association | |AC 2.3: propose a system of hierarchical qualities that meet the particular key and operational needs of a | |organisation | |AC 3.1: distinguish inward and outer partners of an association | |AC 3.2: assess the adequacy of an organisation’s existing correspondence procedures | |AC 3.3: grow new correspondence methodologies for partners of an association that address contrasts in conviction, | |values, customs andâ language | |Assessor Feedback Action Plan | | |Learner’s Feedback | |Assessor signature | |Date | |Learner signature | |Date | |Assessment Criteria |To accomplish the standards the proof must show that the understudy can: | |Task no. | |Evidence | |reference | |AC 1.1, 1.3, 1.4 |Culture: culture as shared qualities; culture at climbing levels; sub-societies; proficient | |1 | |cultures | |Models: Charles Handy †power, job, individual and undertaking societies; Johnson and Scholes social | |web; connections to hierarchical destinations | |AC 1.2 |Organizational culture: industry culture; national and supranational culture; | |1 | |models of culture eg Trompenaars’s understood unequivocal factors, Schein’s three levels | |National societies: techniques for ordering national culture eg crafted by Laurent, Hofstede | |and Trompenaars | | |AC 2.1, 2.2 |Climate profile: how atmosphere is characterized; contrast among atmosphere and culture; | |1,2 | |key parts of authoritative atmosphere eg adaptability; duty; guidelines; rewards; | |clarity; group responsibility; effect of the executives rehearses on atmosphere; effect of atmosphere on | |efficiency and viability | |AC 2.3 |Values: qualities or basic beliefs as a piece of hierarchical culture; emergency of morals | |2 | |in business and the new accentuation on esteem administration †system for creating and supporting| | |strong corporate basic beliefs | | |AC 3.1, 3.3 |Stakeholders: clients, buyers, representatives; investors; governments; | |1, 2 | |communities, business associations and collusions †the expanding need to participate with | |people from various social groupings (counting convictions, qualities, customs and language) | |AC 3.2, 3.3 |Communicating adequately: procedures; recognizing possible boundaries and guaranteeing systems | |1, 2 | |overcome them; creating mindfulness of own and hierarchical culture; advantages of a | |diverse workforce; cultural assimilation programs; intercultural relational abilities | Task Cover Sheet |Assignment Title |Culture, Objectives and improving corporate atmosphere | |In this evaluation you will have chances to give proof against the accompanying rules. Show the page numbers where the proof can be found.| |Attach work where required. | |Learner’s Name: |Assessor: Atif Kauser | |Date Issue: |Completion Date: |Submitted On: | |Qualification: QCF Level 7: Extended Diploma in Strategic Management |Unit No Title: Unit 4: Developing Corporate Culture | |Leadership | |Learner presentation | |I affirm that the work submitted for this task is my own and research sources are completely recognized. | |Learner signature: Date: | |Unit title |4-Developing corporate culture | |Qualification |QCF Level 7 †vital administration initiative | |start date |01-04-2013 | |deadline |05-05-2013 | |Assessor |Atif kauser | |Assignment title: |Culture, Objectives and improving corporate atmosphere | |Scenario: Suppose you work for a business magazine called ‘The Biz Talk’. The supervisor has doled out you with the undertaking of creating the Cover Story for the next| |edition. He needs youâ to compose a nitty gritty article with the title ‘CULTURE, Objectives and Improving Corporate Climate’. | |For this you should pick one association of your advantage, lead an essential and auxiliary examination to assemble raw numbers which will | |support you recorded as a hard copy the article. The article should cover and address the given assignments and results. | |Task 1 | |Having finished with the essential and auxiliary research, lead a basic assessment to examine the ebb and flow practices of your picked association as a case | |study, and Elaborate and clarify the profile of your picked association by tending to the accompanying errands: | | |Analyse the corporate social profile of your association | |Discuss the effect of your organisation’s corporate culture in accomplishing its goals | |Explain how models of association culture educated to you in the instructional exercises can be utilized to accomplish authoritative targets for your picked association | |Explain the distinction among hierarchical and national culture by basically watching the nearness of your association in a specific nation/locale | |Evaluate the current corporate atmosphere of your association | |Identify the inner and outer partners of your association | |evaluate the viability of your organisation’s existing correspondence techniques | |Provides proof for: result 1, AC: 2.1, 3.1, 3.2 | |Task 2 | |Based on your investigation, propose proposals and systems for additional improvement in the zones characterized underneath: | | |Recommend approaches to improve the corporate atmosphere in your association | |Propose a system of hierarchical qualities that meets the particular key and operational needs of your association | |Develop new correspondence methodologies for partners of your association that address contrasts in conviction, qualities, customs and language | |Provides proof for: AC 2.2, 2.3, 3.3 | |This brief has been checked as being fit for reason | |Assessor |Atif Kauser | |Signature | |Date | |Internal verifier |Wajiha Daud | Signature | |Date |

euthanasia outline essays

willful extermination layout articles B. intentional end of life by another by express solicitation of individual who bites the dust C. euthanasia has numerous implications because of good/ethincal/strict terms-mass disarray A. passive willful extermination accelerating demise of individual by pulling back some type of life support 2. stopping clinical methodology, drugs, and so on. 5. most basic offering morphine to patient to control torment yet causing a sooner demise (given to individuals who are critically ill or in a vegetative state) B. active willful extermination making passing through direct activity with reaction a solicitation from that individual, leniency executing C. physician helped self destruction doctor supplies data or potentially methods for ending it all model: deadly portion of resting pills, carbon monoxide gas D. involuntary willful extermination executing of individual without wanting to type of homicide A. quality of human life is a higher priority than length of life B. death is a decent clinical treatment b/c it stops the enduring of the patient C. euthanasia may turn into a monetary need because of the expansion of new infections, AIDS, and their significant expenses D. termination of life of creatures  ¡putting it out if its miseryâ ¡-however with regards to people, we permit lenient to make sure they can live 1. people in vegetative state have delayed existences which are meaning less A. euthanasia is simply one more term for homicide 1. the passing of people ought to be in the hands of god not ourselves 2. killing isn't advocated using any and all means C. who is to choose when the patientâ ¡s mind is oblivious D. if willful extermination is permitted, individuals might be under the feeling that self destruction ... <!

Rambax MIT

Rambax MIT In case you are like me and still feeling somewhat Christmas-y maybe its that I keep listening to Christmas songs, maybe its that we never take down our tree until about July today I bring you photos and videos from our fall Rambax concert, and a special Christmas-related performance that occurred shortly after. Rambax is MITs best (and only) Senegalese drumming (sabar) ensemble that began almost a decade ago, and is led by master sabar drummer, Lamine Tourv ©. Its also sponsored by Professor Patty Tang, who did her PhD in Senegal while studying sabar and has published two books on West African music. Its also RIDICULOUSLY fun. Imagine banging on a drum with a stick. Now bang on your imaginary drum with your hand. Now combine it. See how much imaginary fun youre having? I thought so. (The other fun part is playing different beats in sync with 30 other people, and really getting into the groove but mostly the banging-on-a-drum-with-a-stick thing.) Not only that, but our three hours of practice a week count as a class (21M.460), open to just about anyone with some sense of rhythm and a desire to rock out, so we get 6 units of credit per term just to bang on a drum (well, learn different rhythms and techniques)(but mostly, bang on a drum) for an extended period of time every week. Thats about half the credit of a normal MIT class, but its more than twice the fun and probably relieves a good fraction of the stress accumulated from the more typical MIT classes, so it works out. Our fall concert was held in early December, not long before finals, in the student center. We arrived a few hours early to get ready, try out the acoustics in our new digs, and get decked out in the fancy shirts Patty had accumulated from her time in Senegal: One thing I forgot to mention Lamine is actually a total badass. In fact, shortly before the concert I made this flyer advertising his incredible drumming, superior dancing talent, and skillful crowd-raising ability (read: badassness) to get more people to come to the show. One of the greatest benefits of coming to a university like MIT is that it tends to attract some truly incredible people, and Lamine is one of them. His impromptu solos during our rehearsals and performance, sense of humor and rich singing voice never cease to amaze. Also, his luxurious black dreads. The last part of our performance was a small subgroup of dancers, all of whom were drummers who just decided to put in some extra time to learn some Senegalese dance moves, and pulled off a spectacular performance despite having only about five rehearsals: This is, unfortunately, where all my media stops: I was playing for the rest of the night and, as it turns out, it is rather difficult to take photos and videos while you are banging out songs on a mbung-mbung. My sister took one photo of the performance, which unfortunately doesnt quite capture the scale of the group pictured here are about half of the drummers, mostly all MIT undergrads or affiliates minus Lamine (pictured in the center, dancing away in the center with his drum): Since a photo cant really capture the epic scale of sabar (and especially how loud sabar is lets just say there were a couple of noise complaints), however, I do have a couple good videos, all filmed by Rich 10, another Rambax drummer. Heres a short clip of us rehearsing before the show: No songs from the actual show, though I can tell you it was the most fun Id ever had playing sabar. Lamine totally worked the crowd by dancing, playing, and singing throughout the show, getting the audience to sing or get up and dance along, and teaching them Senegalese phrases like waaw waaw (literally, yes yes, often said in approval of a particularly good solo). Shortly after our drummers played, our dancers took the stage: Patty and Lamine also brought in a wealth of guest performers Lamines cousins from Senegal to join in on the show and show off their mad drumming/dancing skills. To my knowledge, most of these performers are improvising their moves; and the chair at the end was definitely occupied prior to being sat upon: Though the end of fall term is rife with concerts of all types of performing arts dancing, a capella, orchestral music ours was truly unique in that the evening finished with what was essentially a giant party. All drummers came together Rambax and guests alike to stand and play while the audience danced (or at least attempted to) around and throughout us: Which brings us back to Christmas a week or two after the concert, Patty emailed us to announce that wed been asked to play for NPRs Marketplace Money, for a Christmas special on how much itd actually cost to buy all the gifts mentioned in 12 Days of Christmas. You can read the transcript of the broadcatst, as well as listen to a small group of us playing, as the twelve drummers drumming fourteen, to be exact at the end of the piece here: Is a partridge in a pear tree affordable? (Patty noted that, in fact, we would cost nothing to hire since we dont charge anything, and it would be somewhat irrelevant to send someone twelve or fourteen drummers drumming sabar on Christmas since most people in Senegal are Muslim.) Regardless of whether twelve or fourteen sabar drummers are relevant to your religious beliefs, however, I hope your holidays were happy ones!

Analysis Of The Poem Death Of A Soldier - 775 Words

Faaiza Ajmal Webster Watnik English 100 ONLINE 1 December 2014 Analysis: Death of a Solider Louisa May Alcott served as a volunteered nurse during the American Civil War, which took place in the 1860’s. It was a brutal war between the United States and the Confederate states. Alcott documented the last days of a brave solider named John. The almost thirty year old seldom spoke, uttered no complaint, asked no sympathy, but tranquilly observed what went on about him. With the use of several changing literary parts in the essay, Death of a Soldier, written by Louisa May Alcott, the writer s remembrance of such a terrible disaster is a lot simpler to imagine and feel than if she had recited her tale dully and emotionless. The meaning of Louisa May Alcott’s, â€Å"Death of a Soldier† is obvious in its reason to accentuate the different responses of a person in relation to death, in addition to describing the more pleasing results of such a sad incident. She expressed her story by the use of vivid descriptions and similes in her essay. It made the readers in a way experience what she was going through. In her story, Alcott showed the nurse’s sympathy towards John even in the case of his unavoidable death. She showed the soldiers’ unselfish mindset and added meaning to her words by using similarities. She used some key strategies that really brought life to her piece of writing, with the intention of inflicting an intense feeling that is able to move the readers. She was alsoShow MoreRelatedWallace Stevens Poem The Death of a Soldier and William Faulkners Story Two Soldiers: A Comparative Analysis757 Words   |  3 PagesStevens poem The Death of a Soldier and E.E. Cummings poem my sweet old etcetera in your textbook, Select Writers of the Twentieth Century. Select either poem and analyze the view of war in the poem with the view of war in Faulkners story Two Soldiers. The essay should be well- developed and well-supported with the texts. Wallace Stevens The Death of a Soldier honors the common, unremarkable death of an ordinary soldier. War is portrayed as inevitable in the Stevens poem, like theRead MoreCritical Analysis of Wilfred Owens poem Arms and the Boy1660 Words   |  7 PagesCritical Analysis of Wilfred Owens poem Arms and the Boy I. Introduction: 1. Introducing what is going to be discussed in the paper (analysis of Arms and the Boy , its relation to one of Owens poem). 2. Thesis Statement : Wilfred Owens poem Arms and the Boy can be discussed to represent the horror of war. II. Body: 1. Owen was a soldier and a modern poet who was known as anti-war poet. A. A summary of Owens poetry in general . B. His representation of the horror of war in his poems. 2. ArmsRead MoreWilfred Owen’s Dulce et Decorum Est1100 Words   |  5 PagesLiterary Analysis of Wilfred Owen’s â€Å"Dulce et Decorum Est† The world is a changing place with many different countries and people in those countries who try to change the world from our past, future and present. When looking at poems from the past we are able to see the world through the author’s eyes of the time and possible a view into the future. History tells us to learn from the past to improve the future of our world. A way to learn about the past is by reading poems from a time mostRead MoreAnalysis of The Charge Of The Light Brigade by Alfred Lord Tennyson553 Words   |  3 PagesAnalysis of The Charge Of The Light Brigade by Alfred Lord Tennyson The second poem I an going to analyse is The Charge Of The Light Brigade, it is about the Crimean War. It is a famous Regiment of 600 men. The poem was written by Alfred Lord Tennyson. The poem was based on a newspaper account describing a battle. The article glorified the slaughter of men. The commander didnt understand the orders given to him to replace some guns held by the Russians and heRead MoreA Comparison between Shakespeares Agincourt Speech and Wilfred Owens Dulce Et Decorum Est1347 Words   |  6 Pagesthe poems context as well as the origin of the actual passage and how it is created by the influence on each writers own experience. Additionally, the analysis will similarly focus on more intimate elements of each poem such as the attitude towards war at the time that they were written and how the author shows there own attitude and beliefs towards war (The Myth of War). Furthermore the essay will conclude by contextualising the language and structure of each poem, byRead MoreAnalysis of Anthem for Doomed Youth1382 Words   |  6 PagesAnalysis of â€Å"Anthem for Doomed Youth† Originally published in 1920, shortly after World War I, â€Å"Anthem for Doomed Youth† demonstrates the horror of the unjust deaths of young soldiers. â€Å"Anthem for Doomed Youth† is a poem about Owen’s distain towards the honourless way in which young soldiers pass on, and the impact their deaths have on the loved ones they leave behind. The following essay will show that in the anti-war poem, â€Å"Anthem for Doomed Youth†, Owen uses sensational descriptionRead MoreEssay about Analysis of Anthem For Doomed Youth by Wilfred Owen937 Words   |  4 PagesAnalysis of Anthem For Doomed Youth by Wilfred Owen The first poem that I am to analyse is Anthem for Doomed Youth, written by Wilfred Owen. This poem is a sonnet. It has fourteen lines. In this poem, the first and fourth lines rhyme, as do the second and third. The first stanza is mainly about the battlefield, whereas the second stanza is more about the feelings of friends and family back at home. This poem starts off at a quick pace, and then slows down throughout Read MoreEssay about WWI Sources1632 Words   |  7 Pagesallow individuals to better understand the facts, feeling and context of the home front and battlefield of World War One. Autobiographies, diaries, letters, official records, photographs and poems are examples of primary sources from World War One. The two primary sources analyzed in this essay are the poems, â€Å"Anthem for Doomed Youth† by Wilfred Owen and â€Å"In Flanders Fields† by John McCrae. Primary sources are often personal, written from the limited perspective of a single individual. It is veryRead MoreAnalysis of Beach Burial1259 Words   |  6 Pagesï » ¿ Analysis of ‘Beach Burial’ Kenneth Slessor’s poignant poem, ‘Beach Burial’ contemplates on the improper and unfair burial that the Australian soldiers, who were at war with the Germans during World War 2, receive as a result of the fact that they could not get back home. The main idea that the poet was trying to get across was that as a result of the soldiers not being able to get a proper burial, they are not able to be recognized and are considered to be just another casualty of war:Read MoreEssay on Analysis of Dulce Et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen795 Words   |  4 PagesAnalysis of Dulce Et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen The First World War saw the introduction of many new warfare technologies across its theatres due to industrial competition between rival nations. One of the most feared weapons amongst soldiers on both sides was gas. The usage of chlorine, phosgene and mustard gas caused the death of thousands of men by suffocation. Wilfred Owens poem Dulce Et Decorum Est gives a detailed description of a soldier dying from a gas attack

Why Should Christians Read The Catechism. “By This...

Why Should Christians Read the Catechism? â€Å"By this Revelation, then, the invisible God, from the fullness of his love, addresses men as his friends, and moves among them, in order to invite and receive them into his own company.†1 Divine Revelation is not the work of man but rather a gift that God gives to us freely. Without it, we cannot come into the personal relationship that God desires us to have with Himself. It is His thirst for us to know Him that gave birth to Divine Revelation. Our response to it should be that of people thirsting for the satisfaction that we can only find in God. He decided to reveal Himself through the Scriptures and through the Church and so in order to know Him, we must dive deeply into the richness of†¦show more content†¦This results in a more complete understanding of Christianity as a whole. The Catechism of the Catholic Church was written to clearly present the deposit of Christian doctrine so that it may be easily accessible to all people. It includes the â€Å"t eaching of Sacred Scripture, the living Tradition and the authentic Magisterium, as well as the heritage of the spiritual Fathers, Doctors and saints of the Church.†3 Within the four sections of the Catechism, the Profession of the Faith, the Celebration of the Christian Mystery, Life in Christ and Christian are addressed in depth and articulated in a way that can be understand by all. With great excitement, St. John Paul the Great declared it to be a sure norm for teaching the Catholic faith. For Catholics, the Catechism provides the opportunity for individual knowlege and application of Church teachings. It also prepares one to defend and explain the Faith to others when questions arise. This is important, as Christians must â€Å"always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have.†4 On all fronts, Catholics are faced with a culture of death that battles against the truth and life that Christ calls us to. Whethe r the topic of sexuality, suicide or forgiveness comes up, we should always be ready to clearly articulte what we belive and why we do. This can be challenging since some topics demandShow MoreRelatedFreedom, Truth, And Truth1782 Words   |  8 Pagesto be set free? Prevalent to the current trends today, we see that people believe that, in order to achieve truth, and thus freedom, one should establish his or her own law. Having this philosophy commonly leads to human failure for the simple fact that we did not create ourselves; we have a creator, a master, God, who established the moral law. In the Catechism of the Catholic Church, one can see that, â€Å"The moral law presupposes the rational order, established among creatures for their good and toRead MoreIntroduction to Christian Thought Essay9122 Words   |  37 PagesTHEO 104: Introduction to Christian Thought Study Guide Week 1: Introduction to Theology Textbook Readings: Towns: Introduction Ch. 1 1. What year was Jesus born? 4BC in Bethleham, South Palestine to an unknown family 2. When was Christianity made Rome’s National Religion? 313 AD 3. What is the Incarnation? God becoming man and taking on flesh 4. Does the Bible states that Jesus was the creator of the world. Yes (John 1:3; Col. 1:16) 5. Did Jesus claim to haveRead MoreSymbolism and Allegory in Hawthornes Young Goodman Brown Essay2297 Words   |  10 Pagestaught him his catechism, but who readily shows that she certainly knew the Devil and practiced witchcraft. With Brown still confident that he could turn back, his older companion departs, leaving behind his curiously snakelike staff and fully expecting that Brown would follow.      Brown hides yet another time, but again to his surprise he again sees very God-fearing and respectful people such as the minister, and deacon of his church and even - to his horror - his wife, Faith. At this point, heRead MoreThe Vampire Lestat and the Problem of Eternal Damnation Essay3601 Words   |  15 Pagesof God? This is not really an issue for Lestat; as for the majority of the Vampire Chronicles he believes himself to be a form of God. With every life that Lestat takes he is committing a mortal sin, the gravest form of sin and he does so with full knowledge and consent. With reference to Anne Rices Vampire Chronicles and both Interview with the Vampire and Queen of the Damned motion pictures, Lestats journey from mortal to perhaps damned immortal will be cross examined with Christian thought onRead MoreThe Apostles Creed3690 Words   |  15 PagesThe purpose of this paper is to explore the Apostle Creed. It will examine the history and origin of the creed, each sectio n of the creed, and how the creed applied to the early church. The definition of a creed is derived from the Latin credo, I believe. It denotes not just a body of beliefs, but confession of faith. A simple definition, a system of principles, beliefs or the body of teachings of a religious group. The Apostles Creed describes the basic principles of the Christian faith. Read MoreEthical Principles Of Ethics And Corporate Ethics3491 Words   |  14 PagesEthic itself and Human Reasoning. (We will refer to this in class). Ethics Definition: Ethics are the set of moral principles that guide a person s behavior. These morals are shaped by social norms, cultural practices, and religious influences. Ethics reflect beliefs about what is right, what is wrong, what is just, what is unjust, what is good, and what is bad in terms of human behavior. They serve as a compass to direct how people should behave toward each other, understand and fulfill theirRead MoreFdt4 Task 2 Essay5696 Words   |  23 Pagesthat the LDS church has is in the Word of Wisdom. This is in section 89 of the Book of Mormon. It has many guidelines for the members of the church to follow including no alcohol, coffee or tea. Verses 5-9 state, 5 That inasmuch as any man adrinketh bwine or strong drink among you, behold it is not good, neither meet in the sight of your Father, only in assembling yourselves together to offer up your sacraments before him. 6 And, behold, this should be wine, yea, apure wine of the grape of the vineRead MoreRastafarian79520 Word s   |  319 PagesRastafari This page intentionally left blank Rastafari From Outcasts to Culture Bearers Ennis Barrington Edmonds 2003 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford It furthers the Universitys objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Bangkok Buenos Aires Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kolkata Kuala

Romeo and Juliet Comparrison Movie Free Essays

The famous play, â€Å"Romeo and Juliet† by William Shakespeare, have been adapted into two movies. Zeffirelli directed a historical portrayal of the film, and Luhrmann directed a modern interpretation of the film. Both versions were portrayed in Shakespeare’s original text. We will write a custom essay sample on Romeo and Juliet Comparrison Movie or any similar topic only for you Order Now Each movie had use a different approach when it came to setting, props and mood. In Zeffirelli’s version, the setting was a recreation of the 14th century, in the city of Verona, Italy along with ambience of classical music, traditional dancing, renaissance clothing and Shakespearean dialogue. Luhrman’s Hollywood remake called â€Å"Romeo+Juliet† had a combination of original Shakespearean dialogue with a modern twist. The ambience was in Verona beach in the 1990’s that included car chases, costume parties and gunfights. The twist of this version was to imagine the tragic storyline in a modern perspective and how it would fit into today’s society. The props in both movies were different. For instance in the Luhrman’s version, money was used instead of gold coins. This is shown when Romeo pays the apothecary for poison. In this version guns replaced swords. This is shown in the fighting scenes of the movie. Zeffirelli’s had kept the gold coins. An example can be when Romeo gives these coins. He had also kept the swords for the fighting scenes as well, so it can be relevant and historically accurate to Shakespeare’s time. The moods in each movie were very different. In Zeffeirelli’s version the film was very intense and the audience could feel the affection, grief, rage, and enmity of each character. An example can be when Mercutio is giving the famous Queen Mab speech. In this scene the audience can see that Mercutio not just a joker but he also has a dark side. On the other hand in Luhrmann’s version the mood was very comedic and less suspenseful. This was shown from the more humorous yet passionate actors. An example can at the party when Luhrmann dresses Paris in a spaceman suit to make him look ridiculous and uses him as comic relief. This symbolizes that Paris is not what Juliet wants in a man and knows that Romeo is her true love. The passing of time in Zeffeirelli’s version was slower than the faster paced modern version. In both films, a few scenes were left out, such as the fight with Paris at the Capulet’s tomb. In conclusion, Luhrmann and Zeffirelli both interpreted Shakespeare’s play, â€Å"Romeo and Juliet†, very well. One was presented with a modern-day twist and the other presented in the actual times of the original play. Personally, I enjoyed watching Zeffirelli’s version more because it portrayed the authentic work of Shakespeare and the past of Verona, Italy. There was also more suspense and one could feel the tension and emotions of the characters more. How to cite Romeo and Juliet Comparrison Movie, Papers

Socratic Conversation Essay Example

Socratic Conversation Essay Socratic conversation—discussing this in the style of philosophers with hypothetical conversations and monologues. As we drive away from the Jacque Fresco lecture that I made my father, an evolutionary scientist, attend, he frowns and squints through the rain, preparing to say something but never saying it. Q) I’m sorry. He mutters finnally. Q) It’s just when they start talking about no money, that’s when they’ve lost me. I decide to take the approach that works. It’s going to be a long commute. A) You’ve seen the film Dad, we’ve talked before. Q) *grunt* A) Now†¦ Pretend you’re already in a global resource based economy, all that this entails, and remember this means we’ve done away with money and a system based upon this: a monetary system. Q) Who’s going to build my house? A) It isn’t who, but how. This sentence is the true question, your question is a very timely one that is completely limited to the state of technology and knowledge it came from. We don’t pay the ice man to come to our homes anymore, we don’t do this because we freeze water ourselves. ‘Who’s going to freeze my ice? ’ No-one. Q) Well yes, through a freezer that you have to buy. We will write a custom essay sample on Socratic Conversation specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Socratic Conversation specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Socratic Conversation specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer So how? You can’t pay the builder, so how? A) We do this via systems engineering. Pre-fab living spaces are built in half an hour with extrusion technology in a home that’s built as a single unit. Gone are the days of bricks and mortar. You could always build it out of choice. Ultimately when you study this particular aspect of Fresco’s ideas, it becomes quite clear that when it comes to living in such an environment, homes would be built with minimum of risk, maximization of efficiency of materials, easily, quickly, and very much personalized. Q) Fine, but who pays for this process? A) The premise of this exercise was first to assume we live in a non-monetary, Resource Based Economy, but if you want to discuss how we evolved towards this we can discuss that. Needless to say, this is a very different world from the one you and I inhabit now. We live in a world where the primary mechanism is the mechanism of profit. This drives our society now, it won’t in the future. The profit motive actually retards the progress f technology, as well as other aspects of human social wellbeing, creates endless waste, inefficiency, planned obsolescence, and compromises individuals and aggregate institutions (corporations, etc) to pursue profit without regard to the human and environmental consequences, without regard to its relevance to the actual operations and processes of the planet, its relevance to enhancing the lives of men, and gears the true innovative powers of humans towards exactly that: turning a profit. This is where the majority of current ‘innovations’ occur at present. It is an abhorrent system, mechanism, and state that we live in. The profit motive as a driving mechanism of society, rather than the scientific method, will eventually be the end of us. You know this. This is the problem, this is the pivotal cause—the cause of wars, indifference to certain catastrophes and genocides, to mass pollution, mass over population in tiny spaces when we have ample room, planned obsolescence, plundering the planet, destroying natural habitats irrevocably, leeching off of entire ecosystems until we have sucked them dry like a virus, which we have done with Mediterranean fisheries, homelessness, people being denied healthcare, loosing their livelihoods, terrible standards of living, 1 billion starving, people forced to work in mindless, stressful, endless jobs, and on, and on. It compromises science, technology, medicine, people, the environment, as well as things that will one day be irrelevant, such as traditional politics. Let me say the previous point again, and really try to make it as apparent to you as it should be: our current driving mechanism in global society is the mechanism of profit, not the scientific method. We will discuss that later, needless to say, very few people have ever stopped to consider this. You are a scientist. Really stop and think about that when you have some time. Q) Fine, can you tell me how we get to this, though? I don’t hear a lot of that. A) Here we go. It’s both simple and complicated, and, if one is a pessimist, we may not get there. As technology evolves, as with our understanding, goods and services will continually be automated and cybernated. This process is ongoing and the trend will continue whether you like it or not. Goods and services will continually be made more efficient, more productive, and available at lower and lower costs: through the work of engineers and technicians, and essentially the application of the scientific method toward particular problem solving (the problems in this context are framed within the monetary ystem—the problems of increasing productivity, and lowering costs). At our current state, this process was born solely in order to provide goods and services at a cheaper, faster rate for the producer. He could now build 10 toy horses in the time it took to make 1, with half the employees. Two things give a product or service value: the labor involved, and the scarcity of the resources employed. Where is the value in a letter I write to you? The limited trees, processed into paper are the resource, and the man carrying it to you is the labor. What about an email? There is no resource, it is binary code in ones and zeros, and is no longer relevant within this very framework. There is no labor, lest we decide to anthropomorphize the digital process and pay the code for arranging itself on your screen. Incidentally, this email I sent you was free. No scarce, withheld resource, no labor. It is free. Please understand this relationship. As this occurs with more and more things, the economic meltdown of this system is kept on a constant heat. You once had the majority of the labor force in agriculture, but this was phased out with high degrees of automation and more efficient farming: cotton was once entirely picked by people, now, in industrialized countries, it is entirely automated. In western countries, the labor force flocked to the industrial production centre. This ended when mass, more productive and efficient and cheaper mechanical automation took over in all aspects. Machines making machines. Would have sounded too fanciful 100 years ago, but this is the case ubiquitously. The population in countries like the US and Britain were forced to find new work, and what occurred was a mass flock to the service sector. Without this the masses would have been jobless, and the economy would have completely foundered. Now, this sector represents the overwhelming majority of the labor force. And this sector is falling prey to technological unemployment dramatically. The invention of automated bank tellers, which we call ATMs, has phased out the majority’s use of tellers as a means of banking, combined with its cybernation on the internet, where internet banking and phone banking, conducted with automated phone-banking systems, sees next to zero need for human employees. The phone service aspect of the sector is dancing in its own grave. It is all automated at this point. There are no needs for secretaries to do this anymore, and the entire industry is getting rid of them one by one. The internet has redefined retail. It is systematically putting many ace-to-face businesses out of business and on shaky grounds. Digitized media have crippled the music, film and software industries irrevocably. Not many children now, who you have to understand are more tuned into this than you and I, pay for their music, movies, games or software. It is all stored on binary code, which is totally abundant, should be free, and is infinitely copy-able and dist ributed and even altered. I could give many examples, as a last one I will say that my local supermarket is automated. I don’t buy from checkout counter girls, I go to an automated checkout and do it myself. Q) It’ll put the people behind it out of work. A) That’s my overall point. This is a process of phasing out human labor, so absolutely, yes. This is the highest form of efficiency available and possible—technology and what we can make of it. It is not good for the monetary system. But it is the most efficient, productive, and faster moving. Can you understand and appreciate this relationship? Our own social evolution has birthed this, and it is now taking the baton and running with it, exponentially faster, eventually leaving outmoded institutions in the dust. It is already in direct competition with human labor, jobs, and the less efficient market system itself. Future generations will understand this fact, it will be abundantly clear to them. The monetary system is reaching a cancerous stage, is structurally paralyzing at this point, and is a hindrance to social and technological progress. Q) And this process will lead to a resource based, non-money based economy? A) It is part of the process, a very important part. Q) Don’t you think the solution is just to improve the structure of the system? Go back to the gold standard, reign in the bankers, have more transparency, and so on? A) Let’s nip this in the bud. If you assassinated Rockefeller, disbanded the secret societies people fear, reintroduced the gold standard, hanged the bankers and danced with the Ewoks at the end of Return of the Jedi, this thing of ours would continue, unabated, on its trajectory of strategic dominance, acquisition, and conquering, and following that single powerful driving mechanism of profit. All of the problems discussed and that we will continue to discuss in this conversation will be inherent and will continue unabated. It will not solve the problems to, for instance, bring back the gold standard. This will be a very temporary measure to help in certain aspects, a band aid. It is not about patching holes in a box that is inherently flawed, it is not about placing some ointment on a cancerous growth and handing the patient back his pack of cigarettes, it is about realizing the entire system is built on foundations of clay. We will still have a totally flawed, unsustainable, self-destructive, exploitative, maladaptive, socially and technologically retarding system that creates incentives for corruption, wars, inefficiency, denying key goods and services, that plunders the planet with no reference to natural processes, laws, and what is available. It is still an infinite growth paradigm, on a finite world. It is still monumentally stupid, and primitive. Our arguments are far more sophisticated and fundamental than saying ‘if only we could return to the gold standard’, or ‘if only we could stick the bankers with harsher laws’. Monopolies, oligarchs, corruption, domination of resources, exploitation of labor, massive-scale corprotocracy projects—these things are all products of socio-economic evolution within the monetary paradigm. They are born from this. Any such measure as the gold standard or particular auditing laws, and so on, will not stop this inherent nature of this system. Q) Moving on, because you have not yet satisfactorily answered this. How can something be made for free? A) It is possible to produce something with such efficiency that its monetary value is next to nothing, undermining the monetary economy and the incentive to charge and even do it: it requires the automated process to have no forced human labor, no scarce resources, and to be designed in such a way that breakdown, rather than being inherent as it is in our current cheap shoddy, planned obsolescence products that are built to be bought and sold for profit, would have a truly maximized lifespan, truly efficient function and use of power, and eventually self-repairing, just as our own bodies are. Q) Self-repairing machines? Hmm†¦ A) And this is an important point actually: such a society is holistically designed and built on the same premise as an organism like the human body: it does not compete with itself, undercut itself and it is connected through a central nervous system. This is what is meant by a ‘systems approach’ and that’s complex so no need to delve into that right now. Cities and societies of the future, as technical creations, will resemble something closer to an organism, or a cell, than the inefficient, entropic entities we exist in today. What we have now, forget these terms we’ve all been brainwashed with—Capitalism, freedom, democracy, ‘free trade’—this is what it is. Ready? It is conquering. It is a big, grand system based on conquering, not freedom: conquering. We do it on main street, Wall Street, between companies, corporations, countries, everywhere and everyday. We compete for wealth, conquer, and take it. And we convince ourselves and other that we are somehow ‘free’ that we think it’s the right way to be, and that we are civilized. To recap and emphasize my previous point, which I want you to internalize, through automation and cybernation, goods and services will continually be made more and more productively with increasingly lower costs, and its value goes down in correlation. In fact, true peak efficiency in the creation of something renders it valueless in a monetary system, such as communication (this has already occurred). With this constant march of technology, the phenomenon of technological unemployment and the decreasing cost and hence value of production and services, we will be left with a social dilemma of enormous proportions. Technological evolution is in direct competition with the monetary system, and hence this current system of allocating goods and services is in competition with progress itself. It will implode in this fashion. It will only be able to maintain itself, as it has done, through cyclical consumption and hence will require the steady employment of most of the population. However, technological unemployment will continually phase out the latter, which will in turn drastically undercut the former. And hence, an economic and social breakdown will commence, as it has been doing. Not only can the planet not sustain such a system, but the system cannot even maintain itself. This is what happens in reality, things change and move on into new paradigms. Once the system’s integrity is really compromised like this, a necessary shift to something like a Resource Based Economy will be needed. Or we can do to ourselves what the Easter Islanders did. And finally on this note, the process of the global monetary system is set up in such a way, and evolves as such, that it pulls wealth and ownership and hence power into the hands of the few. But make no mistake, it isn’t an evil cabal of devil worshiping bankers, or that Rockefeller sold his soul or a ‘New World Order’ elite who plan secretly from a castle in Bulgaria to dominate the planet. The existence and persistence of a very small sector of society having most of the wealth and hence power is an end result of the way the very system operates. It is a system of dominance and conquering, the bigger shark swallowing the smaller shark. Monopoly is the success story and end result of ‘capitalism’ and money invariably ends in the hands of the few who own most of the world’s land, wealth, and resources. This is a sinister system, and the issues raised by people like John Perkins, are people and organizations simply following the profit motive. Q) Fair enough, I’m aware of that. But right now people still need jobs. A) Please ask yourself this question, should the focus of society be to create and maintain jobs, or to maximize productivity and create abundance? I hope it becomes increasingly clear to you that we cannot and will not have both. The more automation occurs, the more productivity and unemployment occurs. Why has this occurred? Q) Why has automation and that kind of stuff occurred, to build things faster, more efficiently, and cheaper? A) To make more money. Yes. This is the reason it was done in a monetary, profit incentive-based system. But, ironically, it has and will put so many people out of work, and birth higher forms of technology, which it will undercut the very system it emerged from. Please appreciate that with this fact, we belong to a system that is in direct competition with higher productivity and efficiency. That we are in competition, as humans, with machines. But, wait a minute, how ridiculous can you get? We shouldn’t be in competition with machines. That’s preposterous and the more I think about it, the more irritated I am that I was born now and not, say, 300 years from now. Automation is the emancipation proclamation for the human species. Gone are the days of having to march miles to fetch dirty water, toiling in a cotton field, and any other form of servitude for subsistence or money. Q) Yes but it is a problem, because we don’t have that job as an opportunity to make money anymore once it is automated. A) Yes, it is a problem in this system. But it isn’t a problem if it is freeing humans up from monotonous labor. That task is now done by a more productive, faster, drone. And you are not a drone. You should never be knee high in filth in a sewer, your whole damn life, you should never be leaning into an iron ore furnace, supplying it with raw materials, you should never be doing such a thing when we have the technology for an actual drone to do it. When you have an elevator man, who used to crank those levers to make the elevator go up and down, and technology saw to it that all you needed to do was walk in and press a button, the ‘elevator man’ as a job was phased out. Now that’s a problem for him, because he still needs monetary units to survive. When a dangerous British industrial cloth-making factory fazes out the (many missing digits) children from the factory floor with machines, they should be better off, yet what the fuck do they leave it for? They need and don’t have money, and hence are left hungry, homeless, and desperate. When a machine processes cotton with zero human labor, the cotton pickers have a problem, because they need money to have a dignified life. But what is the real problem here? Have you spotted it yet? You cannot stop technology. We are doing our best, to limit it’s use in all sectors, to maintain energy infrastructures that are retarding progress and are dangerous and outmoded, God knows we are trying, but we cannot stop it. And why would anyone want to? Why? Why stop a machine from cleaning disgusting sewers? Why stop an automated factory from producing the pipes for that sewer? Why stop a drone from harvesting cotton all its long life? Because we exist in something called a monetary system. This will be studied by future generations with interest. You believe, and so does the majority of this planet, that automation and cybernation is a bad thing in a major way. Q) I don’t, really. A) In so many words you’ve admitted that you do, though I’m convinced not with complete conviction. The monetary system is the real problem, because when you’ve been freed up from picking cotton, standing at a checkout, working in a factory, you aren’t actually free—you need to pool what we call money from the circulating supply. Without this, you won’t have electricity, food, water, or a shelter. We’ve invented electricity scientifically, but you won’t have it without first having money. We’ve invented clean, abundant tap water, but you won’t have it easily without first getting money for a shelter. Fewer and fewer jobs exist as more and more and more of them are phased out and automated. Q) So you’re saying the system will collapse, essentially? A) I’m saying that’s very possible, and also I want to drill this point in that it isn’t automation that’s the problem, it’s the economic system. It’s very simple. How much unemployment can a place have and absorb efore the integrity of the system is undermined? 40%? 50%? 60%? Q) I agree that the system will self-destruct in many ways. But I don’t really see this other option as working. A) Well, that’s because you haven’t lived in it. I think you would like it. Q) But something will always have some kind of monetary value, no matter how efficient. A) From the perspective of the producer (though they do not likely understand this consciously), true efficiency—true peak efficiency—of the production of something will render it valueless in a monetary system, as I said. The digitized medium birthed by computers is so efficient that it cannot be priced without first forcing artificial barriers and limits on the movie, music, software or website. Youtube and Wikipedia are totally free, as is the PDF of any given paper, but to make it have a monetary value now we will have to restrict the technology, introduce passwords we only give to ‘paying customers’, and create laws and imprison people for breaking them. What would this be? What would this action, this turn of events, really be? Except the un-knowing participation in the self-preservation of the current monetary paradigm, and the current status quo. You have to understand that, ultimately, change is the only constant: mountains rise and fall, the Universe ever expands, organisms live and die, organisms evolve, societies change and evolve, technology is exponentially moving on, etc. And eventually, come what may, the monetary system, and by this I mean the use of money in the creation and distribution of goods and services, is ultimately in direct competition with technological progress. This is because it is ultimately a false institution—one that will seek to preserve itself to no end. It was a necessary aspect of human social evolution, but to assume it is the apex of human achievement, and will always be here, is nothing less than utopian. Q) As I said, not everything can be free though because not everything is actually abundant. A) To move into a resource based global economy would require declaring the world’s resources the common heritage of all of humanity. We would need to do a global resource survey, which has never been done. There are some things that are comparatively scarce, maybe some kind of mineral that we extract an element from to make touch screens. The aim is to use science and technology to create abundance, not target scarcity for money. This does not mean going without. This is what occurs right now. So, imagine we only had enough of a resource to create 100 state of the art touch screens. This isn’t true by the way, but imagine. Our aim is what? To hoard that resource, like a squirrel, and make those 100 touch screens, and sell them to the highest bidder? No. What a petty, primitive solution to that problem. The challenge is to produce touch screens and hence we will seek solutions that do not use this resource, or that artificially recreates this resource. This is not an incentive now. The incentive is to maintain scarcity. It’s why OPEC exists, why we burn and hoard diamonds, and create the notion that something is scarce. That will be the challenge of the future, how to create abundance, not maintain scarcity—we’ve got it the wrong way around. Q) So we will all be wallowing in 7 acre mansions, with golden limousines and leer jets, having everything in abundance and for free?! A) Of course not. Q) So it would not really be possible to have this society then would it? A) Let me make this very clear. It absolutely would not be possible, desirable, or anything less than disgusting to have such an attempted world. Ironically, this is what we are aspiring towards collectively now, and this premise is so far removed from the tenets and ideas of a resource based economy that you may as well ask if we’ll all be Paris Hilton in such a society. Q) But you said everything would be free, and in abundance. A) Bear with me. The system we live under now is built upon the premise of infinite growth. This occurs under a finite planet. It is in direct empirical contention with the way things actually work, the resources of the planet, and its symbiotic processes that we are wholly reliant upon. It cannot work. It is doomed to fail, fail us, or transition to a different paradigm eventually. We cannot plunder the planet for corporate profit endlessly. This is the model our emerging modern human society has built itself upon, and it cannot continue indefinitely. Do you appreciate the starkness of this fact? If you were an Easter Islander, would you eschew these comments? If you were on the Titanic, would you search for lifeboats, tell me to piss off, or fall on your knees and start praying? The paradigm of infinite growth is not possible. It is in conflict with natural law. Constant, endless consumption for profit is doomed to fail. It will be subordinated by the prevailing laws I am referencing. It is a false system, this is what is meant by that statement. No we cannot all have the Donald Trump existence. This is a profoundly ego driven value to aspire towards, and is the product of human ignorance, not inspiration, not innovation, nor knowledge, nor education, nor any insight or understanding. It is point blank the end result of the embarrassing kind of vane, consumerist, artificial and selfish ideology of success imposed upon us by this rather sick system and the values that coevolved alongside it. It is literally impossible to do so. Ted Turner owns more than 2 million acres of land. Of course we cannot have this: this is a preposterous result of paid acquisition of land for private ownership, and ownership itself is an outgrowth of scarcity: a state that we have lived under since our evolution. The only way for this setup to exist, whereby one man owns as much land as a third of a continent, another has 7 leers jets, and the latest rapper has golden toilet seats, 5 mansions, and 60 rooms, is for it to exist where the overwhelming majority suffer with far less, creating a repulsive and socially offensive system of severe comparative advantage in mobility, property, access to goods and services, and overall dignity and quality of life. This existence will never occur for the rest of us. It is rather like having Mr. Creosote eating all the food in a restaurant. Of course if he does this, there will have to be far less consumed and enjoyed by the other patrons, for his gluttony to be possible. And the patrons, raised and groomed in this gross system, either bow down to Creosote, saying they are not worthy to be as he is, or as in the West they have a phony ideology of empowerment and think that everyone in the restaurant should be Mr. Creosote. In fact it will even be the undoing of those very limited few who have the majority of the world’s wealth, because it is the culmination and result of a highly flawed system that is not integrally linked to the actual processes of the planet and its resources: it is so disconnected from this that, speaking with optimism, future generations will see it with the same privileged perspective you and I consider the religious governments attempted upon this world. But of course you and I are not indoctrinated into this. Then consider the difficulty of how indoctrinated a conservative Muslim is when I need so much time and effort to introduce the possibility to you, a highly educated, traveled, liberal scientist that you and I are also indoctrinated into a false arrangement. Entertain this notion for one moment. If you cannot even do this, than please sympathize with the majority of humanity. Q) I get it, we can’t all live like Paris Hilton. So would the standard of life be as good as we can hope to achieve now? A) It would be an order of magnitude better. Free housing, with the best materials we can attain, free water, food, free access to emergent technology that races forward unhindered by the crippling monetary paradigm, free travel to see and experience the world†¦ Q) Stop, this sounds like a fantasy utopia. A) There is no such thing. As Fresco explains, there is no perfect laptop. Of course, if the original computer could have spoken (it was the size of a house and required hundreds to operate), it would have laughed at your projection that one day its current computing power would be housed in something the size of a grain of rice, held in a portable communication and ‘internet’ device by a five year old. It would have called this nothing less than a fanciful computer utopia. Now imagine you go back in time and meet your great, great, great+ grandfather. You see him as a far younger man than you, ill under a tree, teeth rotted out, watching his mate climb the horizon with a makeshift container of water to quench his thirst. She has walked 4 hours to find it. You turn to him and tell him that you are over twice his age, with all your teeth, that you move at speeds he cannot fathom in a man-made creature that also sings your favorite songs to you, and that your wife, rather than risking health, life and limb, and using most of her day to go and get water, presses a magic button and it comes out, fast and cool as the freshest stream. And the other button, it sends it out hot, just for kicks. He will deem you a liar, a madman, a utopian wizard. The point is, you see, that what we consider ‘utopia’ is culturally and historically relative. An Inuit has no use for the latest stainless steel refrigerator. He wants a fine hunting season. If you told him about a giant building called a ‘supermarket’ with every form of meat in abundance, and all you need to do is go and pick it up, he would call you a utopian madman. So what do you and I live under? What system, what arrangement? We have to submit to employment to pool monetary credits from the general circulation, and guard it jealously, and use it to attain food, living spaces, items we desire, and leisure time. We have ‘buying power’ from it. The more we have, the more choices, more freedom. So to you and I, in this existence, we perceive a lack of this striving as utopian, just as the Savannah hunter gatherer did with the lack of striving you experience. We lack the frame of reference, just as he did. I will end by telling you that a utopia is a fixed state, and this goes against our very premise: one of change, constant change. ‘Utopia’ can slot alongside other primitive human imaginings, like heaven. Q) Okay, but to be honest, the more I listen, the more it just sounds like Communism. A) Okay? Dad, you’re an evolutionary scientist. Q) Uhuh? A) What you think if you started explaining evolution to me, and I said â€Å"Gosh, that sounds a lot like Social Darwinism. † Q) I’d say that’s besides the point. A) You see, you can find overlaps in certain idea, but that doesn’t make them synonymous, you know that. The fact is, the philosophy of ‘Capitalism’, which is economic survival of the fittest through competition and everyone for themselves, sounds an awful like ‘socio-economic’ Darwinism, does it not. Q) *chuckle* A) This is a very reoccurring argument that comes up and, you not being indoctrinated into a generation of Communism witch hunts, are not truly sincere in some kind of fear that leads you to label something like this Communism, surely? Q) Well†¦ A) Supposing you were. Here’s the deal. It isn’t Communism. The argument is quite funny actually, in that it makes the claim that what we are proposing has been tried before, it was called Communism, and it doesn’t work. Having a global Resource Based Economy, utilizing the scientific method for the driving mechanism of society rather than the profit motive, has never been tried before. Karl Marx did not for see the technological and scientific innovations and capabilities that are the foundations of our arguments. His arguments were not even in the same cosmos. He did not understand, as it didn’t exist, the insight of replacing drudgery of forced servitude with automation, and was not advocating the intelligent management of the earth’s resources and applying the scientific method to society. When have we done this before? Never. How can you call it Communism? There are certain broad concepts that overlap, others that are similar, while others that incongruent with one another. This being addressed, The Venus Project and Communism, as you brought up, are no more the same thing as a rectangle is the same thing as a triangle. Look at the US Constitution†¦ All men created equal†¦ That’s Communism! What about Jesus†¦ Love thy neighbor? Give away possessions? He’s a Communist! Here’s the thing, people are taking certain broad ideas, labeling them Communist, and thereby boxing them into a corner, painting them with a broad brush, and negatively stigmatizing them. It’s called ad homonym, and it is entirely unhelpful, and not the product of hi